Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSN., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 18 · caselaw · US
General
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSN., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
393 U.S. 18·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSN., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 355.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Bryce Rea, Jr., and Thomas M. Knebel for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Robert W. Ginnane, and Emmanuel H. Smith for the United States et al., James T. Johnson for Pacific Progress Shippers Assn., Inc., and Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for American Institute of Shippers’ Assns., Inc., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.