Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Waterman et al. v. The Aakre et al., 1941 — 314 U.S. 690 · caselaw · US
General
Waterman et al. v. The Aakre et al.
314 U.S. 690·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 715.
Waterman et al. v. The Aakre et al.
December 8, 1941.
Messrs. D. Roger Englar, T. Catesby Jones, and F. Herbert Prem for petitioners. Messrs. John W. Griffin and Wharton Poor for Rederi A/S Henneseid; Mr. George C. Sprague for the Continental Grain Co.; and Mr. Chauncey I. Clark for the Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.