Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Laura H. JENNINGS, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Frederick B. Jennings, Deceased, Appellee, v. Charles W. ANDERSON, Individually and as United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Third District of New York, Appellant, 1930 — 43 F.2d 683 · caselaw · US
Tax
Laura H. JENNINGS, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Frederick B. Jennings, Deceased, Appellee, v. Charles W. ANDERSON, Individually and as United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Third District of New York, Appellant
43 F.2d 683·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Laura H. JENNINGS, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Frederick B. Jennings, Deceased, Appellee, v. Charles W. ANDERSON, Individually and as United States Collector of Internal Revenue for the Third District of New York, Appellant.
No. 329.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 21, 1930.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Leon E. Spencer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Ewing Everett, of New York City (Miller & Chevalier, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
.This case presents the same questions as those discussed in the opinion in Reeves v. Anderson, 43 F.(2d) 679, handed down herewith. In accordance with that opinion, the judgment herein will be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Judgment reversed; new trial ordered.