Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Powell v. Silver, District Attorney, Kings County, New York, 1964 — 379 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
General
Powell v. Silver, District Attorney, Kings County, New York
379 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 17, 1964.
No. 99.
Powell v. Silver, District Attorney, Kings County, New York.
Maurice Edelbaum for petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York and Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department. Petition dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.