Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David Mayer, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, 1892 — 132 N.Y. 579 · caselaw · US
General
David Mayer, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent
132 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Mayer, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 7, 1892;
decided March 22, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March If, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
B. F. Fkistein for appellant.
Hamilton Harris for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.