General
LANCHASHIRE SHIPPING COMPANY, Limited, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant; TOKIO MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant; STANDARD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant; STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant
48 F.2d 1077·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LANCHASHIRE SHIPPING COMPANY, Limited, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant. TOKIO MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant. STANDARD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee, v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY, Appellant.
Nos. 288-291.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 6, 1931.
Palmer & Furman, of New York City (Courtland Palmer and Chauncey I. Clark, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr., of New York City, for Lancashire Shipping Co., Limited.
Leonard J. Matteson, of New York City, for other appellees.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER .CURIAM.]
PER .CURIAM.
Decrees [43 F.(2d) 750] affirmed on •opinion below.