Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CANTON POULTRY, INC., et al. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF FLORIDA, 1967 — 388 U.S. 458 · caselaw · US
General
CANTON POULTRY, INC., et al. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF FLORIDA
388 U.S. 458·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CANTON POULTRY, INC., et al. v. CONNER, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF FLORIDA.
No. 1315.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Homer S. Durden, Jr., for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm’n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U. S. 281, 282.