Contracts · MBE-tested
KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE
368 U.S. 516·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE.
No. 615.
Decided February 19, 1962.
Aram K. Berberian for appellant.
J. Joseph Nugent; Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.