Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN et al., trading as STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO., 1967 — 389 U.S. 29 · caselaw · US
General
LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN et al., trading as STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO.
389 U.S. 29·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN et al., trading as STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO.
No. 322.
Decided October 16, 1967.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hofjman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U. S. 324.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan
would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.