Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
STANDARD CIGAR CO. v. TABACALERA SEVERIANO JORGE, S. A., 1964 — 376 U.S. 780 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
STANDARD CIGAR CO. v. TABACALERA SEVERIANO JORGE, S. A.
376 U.S. 780·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STANDARD CIGAR CO. v. TABACALERA SEVERIANO JORGE, S. A.
No. 78.
Decided April 6, 1964.
William, A. Gillen for petitioner.
Thomas H. Anderson and Herbert L. Nadeau for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, ante, p. 398.