Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sarah Lasher, Respondent, v. The Village of Saratoga Springs, Appellant, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 582 · caselaw · US
General
Sarah Lasher, Respondent, v. The Village of Saratoga Springs, Appellant
163 N.Y. 582·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah Lasher, Respondent, v. The Village of Saratoga Springs, Appellant.
Lasher v. Village of Saratoga Springs, 17 App. Div. 634, affirmed.
(Argued May 18, 1900;
decided June 5, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 7, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Joseph JP. Brennan for appellant.
Edgar T. Brackett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the case of Moody v. Village of Saratoga Springs (163 N. Y. 581).
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Landon, J.