Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Jeremiah, Respondent, v. Rosina A. Pitcher, Appellant, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 574 · caselaw · US
Tax
William Jeremiah, Respondent, v. Rosina A. Pitcher, Appellant
163 N.Y. 574·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Jeremiah, Respondent, v. Rosina A. Pitcher, Appellant.
Jeremiah v. Pitcher, 26 App. Div. 402, affirmed.
(Argued May 7, 1900;
decided May 22, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 26, 1898, reversing in part and affirming in part a judgment decreeing that the facts proved did not establish a trust in favor of plaintiff in the lands described in the complaint, but that plaintiff was entitled to liens thereon for the amount of certain mortgages, interest and taxes paid by him, with which said land had been incumbered.
Henry Major for appellant.
P. Harwood Vernon for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, "Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.