Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of The Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company to Acquire Title to Real Estate. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company, Respondent, v. John S. Nagel et al., Appellants, 1896 — 150 N.Y. 562 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of The Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company to Acquire Title to Real Estate. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company, Respondent, v. John S. Nagel et al., Appellants
150 N.Y. 562·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of The Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company to Acquire Title to Real Estate. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company, Respondent, v. John S. Nagel et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 15, 1896;
decided October 6, 1896.)
Brooklyn El. B. B. Go. v. Nagel, 75 Hun, 590, affirmed.
Appeal from order of the General Terna of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made February 16, 1894, which--affirmed an. order of Special Term appointing commissioners in condemnation proceedings.
Raphael J. Moses for appellants.
- William N. Cohen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.