General
Gilbert Murdock, as Administrator, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Harriet Robinson, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
145 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gilbert Murdock, as Administrator, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Harriet Robinson, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted March 11, 1895;
decided March 19, 1895.)
Motion to amend remittitur.
E. M. Harris for motion.
Lynn, J. Arnold opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to amend remittitur so as to declare “ that the judgment be affirmed so far as it affects the part of the premises owned by the Lamb heirs, and that it be reversed as to the part of the- premises owned by Clarissa Waterman,” and in other respects that the motion be denied. No opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.