Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gustave Heye, as Sole Surviving Executor of Alexander M. Lawrence, Deceased, Appellant, v. Henry M. Tilford, as Sole Surviving Executor of John C. Giles, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1897 — 154 N.Y. 757 · caselaw · US
General
Gustave Heye, as Sole Surviving Executor of Alexander M. Lawrence, Deceased, Appellant, v. Henry M. Tilford, as Sole Surviving Executor of John C. Giles, Deceased, et al., Respondents
154 N.Y. 757·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gustave Heye, as Sole Surviving Executor of Alexander M. Lawrence, Deceased, Appellant, v. Henry M. Tilford, as Sole Surviving Executor of John C. Giles, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Heye v. Tilford, 2 App. Div. 346, affirmed.
(Argued October 25, 1897;
decided November 23, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 16, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.
Edward B. Ifill for appellant.
Peter B. Olney for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion. '
All concur.