Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Heywood et al., Appellants, v. William M. Thacher, as Assignee, etc., Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1892 — 135 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Heywood et al., Appellants, v. William M. Thacher, as Assignee, etc., Impleaded, etc., Respondent
135 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Heywood et al., Appellants, v. William M. Thacher, as Assignee, etc., Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Argued October 3, 1892;
decided October 11, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 3, 1892, which reversed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee passing the accounts of an assignee.
Abram Klmg for appellants.
Fdwm G. Gloyd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on argument.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.