Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Giles Corl et al., Respondents, v. Harry Corl, Appellant, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
General
Giles Corl et al., Respondents, v. Harry Corl, Appellant
110 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Giles Corl et al., Respondents, v. Harry Corl, Appellant.
(Argued June 21, 1888;
decided October 2, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 21, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the' court on trial at Special Term and which denied a motion for a new trial.
Oliver Porter for appellant.
R. H. Duel for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.