Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert A. RUCHO, et al., applicants, v. COOMON CAUSE, et al., 2018 — 138 S. Ct. 923 · caselaw · US
General
Robert A. RUCHO, et al., applicants, v. COOMON CAUSE, et al.
138 S. Ct. 923199 L. Ed. 2d 619·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert A. RUCHO, et al., applicants,
v.
COOMON CAUSE, et al.
No. 17A745.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 18, 2018.
The application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is granted, and it is ordered that the order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, case Nos. 1:16-CV-1026 and 1:16-CV-1164, entered January 9, 2018, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court.
Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would deny the application for stay.