Corporations
The City of New York, Respondent, v. Artemas H. Holmes, Appellant
184 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of New York, Respondent, v. Artemas H. Holmes, Appellant.
City of New York v. Holmes, 104 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Submitted March 22, 1906;
decided April 6, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division 'of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 1, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury and an order denying a motion for a new trial.'
Artemas If. Holmes for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Royal H T. Riggs of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.