Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Simon Sternfels, Respondent, v. Edward Clark, Appellant, 1877 — 70 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Simon Sternfels, Respondent, v. Edward Clark, Appellant
70 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Simon Sternfels, Respondent, v. Edward Clark, Appellant.
(Argued June 14, 1877;
decided June 22, 1877.)
J. J. Perry, for appellant.
J. L. Overfield, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, on opinion of court below. All concur, except Sapallo, J., absent. Judgment affirmed.