Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wixman v. United States, 1948 — 335 U.S. 874 · caselaw · US
General
Wixman v. United States
335 U.S. 874·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 6, 1948.
No. 263.
Wixman v. United States.
A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman filed a memorandum for the United States suggesting that certiorari issue and that, without further argument, the judgment below be reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court. Briefs of amici curiae supporting the petition were filed by Charles A. Horsky, Julien Cornell, Osmond K. Fraenkel and Arthur Garfield Hays for the American Civil Liberties Union; Robert W. Kenney for the National Lawyers Guild et al.; and Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, Irving Hill, Shad Polier, William Maslow and Joseph B. Robison for the American Jewish Congress.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the District Court is reversed for the reason that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support it. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings.