Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of James M. Clark et al., to Appraise Damages Sustained, etc., Respondents, v. The Water Commissioners of Amsterdam, Appellant, 1890 — 119 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of James M. Clark et al., to Appraise Damages Sustained, etc., Respondents, v. The Water Commissioners of Amsterdam, Appellant
119 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of James M. Clark et al., to Appraise Damages Sustained, etc., Respondents, v. The Water Commissioners of Amsterdam, Appellant.
(Argued January 13, 1890;
decided January 28, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made February 7, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners of assessment herein.
J. B. Perkins for appellant.
Robert J. Sanson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.