General
The Saint Nicholas Bank, Respondent, v. Percy R. King, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
118 N.Y. 687·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Saint Nicholas Bank, Respondent, v. Percy R. King, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued January 30, 1890;
decided March 4, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 6, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict hy the court, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial, and affirming an order vacating a judgment against two of the defendants, entered previous to the trial.
David Willcox for appellant.
Edwin B. Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except Follett, Ch. J., dissenting, and Haight, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.