Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clark v. Kimmitt, Secretary of the Senate, et al., 1977 — 431 U.S. 950 · caselaw · US
General
Clark v. Kimmitt, Secretary of the Senate, et al.
431 U.S. 950·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Mr. Justice Blackmun, Mr. Justice Rehnqutst, and Mr. Justice Stevens would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, and deny certiorari.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 6, 1977
No. 76-1105.
Clark v. Kimmitt, Secretary of the Senate, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from C. A. D. C. Cir.
Mr. Justice Blackmun, Mr. Justice Rehnqutst, and Mr. Justice Stevens would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, and deny certiorari.