Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re RABINOWITZ et al., 1924 — 5 F.2d 232 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In re RABINOWITZ et al.
5 F.2d 232·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re RABINOWITZ et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 2, 1924.)
No. 115.
Bankruptcy <®=446 — Findings of fact by lower court conclusive.
Findings of fact by lower court are conclusive on review by petition to revise.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
In the matter of Samuel Rabinowitz and others, individually and as copartners, trading as the Aldo Shirt Company, bankrupts. On petition by bankrupts to revise order in bankruptcy directing them to pay over to Norman Tauber, trustee, money withheld by them.
Order affirmed.
Kopp, Markewich & Pearlinan, of New York City (Samuel Markewich and Joseph G. M. Browne, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners.
Shaine & Weinrib, of New York City (Maurice L. Shaine, of New York City, of counsel), for trustee respondent.
Before HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We are of opinion that this petition raises nothing but questions of fact. As to questions of fact the findings below conclude us, although we have no desire to differ from the conclusions reached by the special master.
Order affirmed, with costs.