Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re COMMERCIAL SAVINGS & LOAN CO., 1930 — 45 F.2d 186 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In re COMMERCIAL SAVINGS & LOAN CO.
45 F.2d 186·United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re COMMERCIAL SAVINGS & LOAN CO.
No. 19274.
District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.
April 24, 1930.
Raymond E. Hyre, Day & Day, and Clemens R. Frank, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for bankrupt.
II. H. Rose and Richard L. MeNelly, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioning creditors.
H. H. Rose and Clemens'R. Frank, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for receiver.
T. J. Moffett, Henry A. Pollack, and Harry H. Roso, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for trustees,
T. J. Moffett and A. H. Hill, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for assignee.
[MAJORITY — JONES, District Judge.]
JONES, District Judge.
Exceptions waived in open court.
Report approved.