Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Estate of Schroeder et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1949 — 338 U.S. 884 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Estate of Schroeder et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
338 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 103.
Estate of Schroeder et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the motion of the petitioners for a clarification of the order of October 10, ante, p. 801, the order is amended to read as follows: “Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of T. D. 5741, 14 Fed. Reg. 5536; the Technical Changes Act of October 25, 1949, 63 Stat. 891; and Commissioner v. Estate of Church, 335 U. S. 632, and Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner, 335 U. S. 701.”
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.