Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re NEW ENGLAND TIRE & RUBBER CO., 1926 — 13 F.2d 1004 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
In re NEW ENGLAND TIRE & RUBBER CO.
13 F.2d 1004·United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re NEW ENGLAND TIRE & RUBBER CO.
(District Court, D. Massachusetts.
June 15, 1926.)
No. 34520.
Bankruptcy @=>342 — Single creditor-cannot petition for review of order affecting estate generally.
After appointment and qualification of trustee, single creditor has no standing to petition for review' of order affecting estate generally, which can only be done by the trustee, and if he. refuses to act, application should be made to referee. or judge to require him to act, or to authorize creditor to. act in his name.
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the New England Tire & Rubber Company, bankrupt. On petition by creditor to review order of referee.
Petition dismissed.
: Daniel Needham, of Boston, Mass., for creditor Gotham Nat. Bank.
,F. - Paul Wei sell, of Boston, Mass., for creditor' George W. Pitman.
[MAJORITY — MORTON,' District Judge.]
MORTON,' District Judge.
A single
oreditor has no standing, after the appointment and qualification of a trustee, to claim review of an order' affeeting the estate generally; such review can be taken only by the trustee. In re Lewensohn (C. C. A. 2d) 121 F. 538, 57 C. C. A. 600; Remington on Bankruptcy (3d Ed.) § 3634; Collier on Bankruptcy (13th Ed.) p. 1172. The proper practice, where the trustee refuses to act, is by application to the referee, or to the judge, to direct him to act, or to authorize the creditor to act in the trustee’s name. In re Mexico Hardware Co. (D. C.) 197 F. 650.
Moreover, if the review were properly here, the facts must be taken as stated in the certificate; the evidence not being reported. The question involved is one of business administration, on which the judgment of the referee is entitled to -much weight; and it by no means appears that his order was clearly wrong.
Petition for review dismissed.