Contracts · MBE-tested
Brandt v. United States; Brack v. United States; Brandt v. United States; Gebhardt v. United States; Hoven v. United States; Mrugowsky v. United States; Sievers v. United States; Fischer v. United States; Genzken v. United States; Handloser v. United States; Rose v. United States; Schroeder v. United States; Becker-Freyseng v. United States; and Beigelboeck v. United States
333 U.S. 836·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that the petitions should be set for hearing on the question of the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 286,
No. 287,
No. 288,
No. 289,
No. 290,
No. 291,
No. 292,
No. 293,
No. 294,
No. 295,
No. 296,
No. 297,
No. 298,
No. 299,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc,
Misc.
Brandt v. United States; Brack v. United States; Brandt v. United States; Gebhardt v. United States; Hoven v. United States; Mrugowsky v. United States; Sievers v. United States; Fischer v. United States; Genzken v. United States; Handloser v. United States; Rose v. United States; Schroeder v. United States; Becker-Freyseng v. United States; and Beigelboeck v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus and prohibition denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that the petitions should be set for hearing on the question of the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.