Contracts · MBE-tested
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
372 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 614.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Robert L. Stern, Joseph J. Daniels, Harry S. Littman and Raymond N. Shibley for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle, Morton Hollander, Kathryn H. Baldwin, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Peter H. Schiff for the Federal Power Commission; Aloysius J. Suchy and F. Clifton Lind for the County of Wayne, Michigan; and Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Eugene Krasicky, Solicitor General, and Benjamin F. Gibson and Hugh B. Anderson, Assistant Attorneys General, for Michigan Public Service Commission, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.