General
St. Louis Expanded Metal Fireproofing Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Standard Fireproofing Company
195 U.S. 627·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 179.
St. Louis Expanded Metal Fireproofing Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Standard Fireproofing Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted December 5, 1904:
Decided December 12, 1904.
Case reported below 177 Missouri, .359.
Mr. James A: Carr for-plaintiff in error.
Mr. Frank L. Shepard and Mr. Hervey S. Knight for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mutual Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 29Í; Turner v. Richardson, 180 U. S. 87; Home jorK Incurables v. New York, 187 U. S. 155; Layton v. Missourij. 187 U. S. 356.