Contracts · MBE-tested
Caudle v. United States; and Connelly v. United States
356 U.S. 921·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petitions should be granted. · Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 738.
No. 739.
Caudle v. United States; and Connelly v. United States.
C. Arthur Anderson and John J. Hooker for petitioner in No. 738. Jacob M. Lashly, John H. Lashly, Paul B. Rava and Alan Y. Cole for petitioner in No. 739.
Solicitor General Rankin, Roger Fisher and Carl H. Imlay for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petitions should be granted.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reported below: 249 F. 2d 576.