Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The New York Brick and Paving Company, Appellant, v. Bronx Borough Bank of New York, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 559 · caselaw · US
General
The New York Brick and Paving Company, Appellant, v. Bronx Borough Bank of New York, Respondent
186 N.Y. 559·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The New York Brick and Paving Company, Appellant, v. Bronx Borough Bank of New York, Respondent.
New York Brick & Paving Co. v. Bronx Borough Bank of New York, 105 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
(Argued October 12, 1906;
decided October 26, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 12, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover for the alleged conversion of certain checks.
Louis L. Waters for appellant.
Hervry G. Henderson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edwabd T. Baktlett, Haight, Yann and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gbay, J. Not sitting: Hiscock,' J.