Corporations
The City of New York, Respondent, v. John Watts de Peyster et al., Defendants, and Walter J. Salomon, Appellant
190 N.Y. 547·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of New York, Respondent, v. John Watts de Peyster et al., Defendants, and Walter J. Salomon, Appellant.
City of New York v. de Peyster, 120 App. Div. 762, affirmed.
(Submitted December 6, 1907;
decided December 20, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 31, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the continuance of an encroachment upon a street in the city of New York.
William Allan Hoar for appellant.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and George O'Reilly of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Cullen, Gh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.