Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel Schout, Jr., Appellant, v. The Conkey Avenue Saving, Aid and Loan Association, Respondent, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 668 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel Schout, Jr., Appellant, v. The Conkey Avenue Saving, Aid and Loan Association, Respondent
156 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel Schout, Jr., Appellant, v. The Conkey Avenue Saving, Aid and Loan Association, Respondent.
Sellout y. Gonkey Ave. Saving Assn., 87 Hun, 568, affirmed.
(Argued May 6, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 29, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint on trial at Circuit.
Herbert J. Stull for appellant.
Edwin McKnight for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.