General
Camberling versus M'Call
3 U.S. 4773 Dall. 477·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1798·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Camberling versus M'Call.
THIS caufe (fee 2 Vol. 280.) being agí . called cn the lift of arguments, the Court declared, that although they had. propofed to the Defendant’s counfel to wave the ob-jedtion to the form of bringing the action, before the expira.tion of three months from the time of proving the lofs; yet, that on his refufal to do fo, they meant to decide in favor of the objection.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment was, accordingly, entered for the Defendant