Corporations
In the Matter of the Petition of Emily J. Hollister et al., Appellants, to Vacate an Assessment. The City of Rochester, Respondent
180 N.Y. 518·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Emily J. Hollister et al., Appellants, to Vacate an Assessment. The City of Rochester, Respondent.
Matter of Hollister, 96 App. Div. 501, affirmed.
(Argued November 16, 1904;
decided December 30, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate' Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 5, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying an application to vacate an assessment for a local improvement.
George D. Reed, John P. Bowman and John F. Kinney for appellants.
William W. Webb, Corporation Counsel (B. B. Cunningham of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ. Dissenting : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray and O’Brien, JJ.