Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cosmark et al. v. Struthers Wells Corp. et al., 1964 — 376 U.S. 962 · caselaw · US
General
Cosmark et al. v. Struthers Wells Corp. et al.
376 U.S. 962·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 751.
Cosmark et al. v. Struthers Wells Corp. et al.
George J. Barco and Yolanda G. Barco for petitioners. John C. Bane, Jr. and John G. Wayman for Struthers Wells Corp., and Louis Sherman and Laurence J. Cohen for International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers of America, AFL-CIO, et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.