Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of Philip R. Underhill, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, Elizaheth R. Guion, Appellant, 1891 — 124 N.Y. 653 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of Philip R. Underhill, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, Elizaheth R. Guion, Appellant
124 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of Philip R. Underhill, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, Elizaheth R. Guion, Appellant.
(Argued February 25, 1891;
decided March 10, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 18,1890, which affirmed a decree of the surrogate of the comity of Westchester dismissing the petition in the above entitled matter.
Alex. Thain for appellant.
A. 12. Dyett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.