Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry W. Sage et al., Respondents, v. Shepard & Morse Lumber Company, Appellant, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 672 · caselaw · US
General
Henry W. Sage et al., Respondents, v. Shepard & Morse Lumber Company, Appellant
158 N.Y. 672·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry W. Sage et al., Respondents, v. Shepard & Morse Lumber Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 13, 1899;
decided January 31, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 18, 1896, modifying and, as modified, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Sage v. Shepard & Morse Lumber Co., 4 App. Div. 290, affirmed.
Charles E. Patterson for appellant,
Hamilton Harris for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.