Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Andrew B. C. DOHRMANN, Respondent, 1932 — 56 F.2d 1081 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Andrew B. C. DOHRMANN, Respondent
56 F.2d 1081·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Andrew B. C. DOHRMANN, Respondent.
No. 6718.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1932.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, it is ordered that the order of the said Board of Tax Appeals in this cause be, and hereby is, reversed, and that this cause be, and hereby is, remanded to the said Board of Tax Appeals with directions to enter a final order and decision that there are deficiencies for the calendar years 1920 and 1921 in the amounts of $19,704.13 and $3,970.74, respectively.