Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catherine Mehegan, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1891 — 125 N.Y. 768 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Catherine Mehegan, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
125 N.Y. 768·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur, except Andrews, J., not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine Mehegan, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued February 3, 1891;
decided February 24, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo, entered upon an order made March 24, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered up.on a verdict.
This was an action to recover damages for the death of Cornelius Mehegan, plaintiffs intestate, who was killed by a train at a street crossing, alleged to have been caused by defendants’s negligence. The judgment was reversed here upon the ground' that the undisputed evidence showed that plaintiffs intestate was chargeable with contributory negligence in not looking or in heedlessly attempting to cross the railroad track when a train in plain sight was backing down thereon.
James Fraser Gluck for appellant.
Truman O. White for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for reversal.
All concur, except Andrews, J., not voting.
Judgment reversed.