Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William J. Underwood et al., as Executors of Emory M. Van Tassel, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Greenwich Insurance Company, Appellant, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
William J. Underwood et al., as Executors of Emory M. Van Tassel, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Greenwich Insurance Company, Appellant
184 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William J. Underwood et al., as Executors of Emory M. Van Tassel, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Greenwich Insurance Company, Appellant.
Underwood v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 103 App. Div. 610, affirmed.
(Argued March 28, 1906;
decided April 17, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 8, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
John Notman and Henry Galbraith Ward for appellant.
George Richards for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.