Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Virginia DUNKLEE, Appellant, v. The CUNARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Ltd., Appellee, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1003 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Virginia DUNKLEE, Appellant, v. The CUNARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Ltd., Appellee
69 F.2d 1003·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Virginia DUNKLEE, Appellant, v. The CUNARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Ltd., Appellee.
No. 328.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 5, 1934.
Fitzgerald, Foote & Fitzgerald, of New Haven, Conn., and George W. R. Hughes and Hill & Rivkins, all of New York City (Gregory S. Rivkins, of New York City, David E. Fitzgerald, Jr., of New Haven, Conn., and Barton P. Ferris, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Lord, Day & Lord, of New York City (Tlmddeus G. Cowell and Woodson D. Scott, both of New York City, of counsel), for ap-pellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.