Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Company, Respondent, v. The Barber Asphalt Paving Company, Appellant, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
The Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Company, Respondent, v. The Barber Asphalt Paving Company, Appellant
173 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Company, Respondent, v. The Barber Asphalt Paving Company, Appellant.
Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paring Co., 54 App. Div, 629, affirmed.
(Argued December 16, 1902;
decided January 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 15, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Irving Lester Fisk, for appellant.
J. H. Metcalf for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting : Haight, J. Taking no part: Cullen and Werner, JJ.