Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Haight & Freese Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Beverly R. Robinson, Receiver, etc., 1906 — 203 U.S. 581 · caselaw · US
General
Haight & Freese Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Beverly R. Robinson, Receiver, etc.
203 U.S. 581·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 241.
Haight & Freese Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Beverly R. Robinson, Receiver, etc.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 22, 1906.
Decided October 29, 1906.
Mr. Albert I. Sire for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Roger Foster for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U. S. 117, 122; Nelson v. United States, 201 U. S. 92; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Beardsley v. Railway Company, 158 U. S. 123.