Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth E. CRAVENS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1932 — 61 F.2d 1024 · caselaw · US
Tax
Elizabeth E. CRAVENS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
61 F.2d 1024·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth E. CRAVENS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 9445.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Sept. 1, 1932.
Pad jo Cravens, of Pt. Smith, Ark., for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Se-wall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Maxwell M. Mahany, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order of Board of Tax Appeals affirmed, and petition to review dismissed on stipulation of parties that cause abide decision in No. 9441, Mont S. Echols v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 61 F.(2d) 191, in which opinion was filed on August 20, 1932.