Contracts · MBE-tested
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al. v. National Mediation Board et al.; and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. National Mediation Board et al.
396 U.S. 878·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 200.
No. 206.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al. v. National Mediation Board et al.; and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. National Mediation Board et al.
Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway, William H. Dempsey, Jr., David W. Miller, and James A. Wilcox for petitioners in No. 200, and Harold A. Ross for petitioner in No. 206. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, Robert V. Zener, and Walter H. Fleischer for respondent National Mediation Board, and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Daniel H. Pollitt, Elliott C. Lichtman, and Isaac N. Groner for respondent Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 133 U. S. App. D. C. 326, 410 F. 2d 1025.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.