Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Florida Economic Advisory Council v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1958 — 356 U.S. 959 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Florida Economic Advisory Council v. Federal Power Commission et al.
356 U.S. 959·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 911.
Florida Economic Advisory Council v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Bryce Rea, Jr. for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel D. Slade, Bernard Cedarbaum, Willard W. Gatchell, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and William, W. Ross for the Federal Power Commission, Leon M. Payne for the Coastal Transmission Corporation, Theodore Rine-hart, Norman E. Duke and Robert M. Scott for the Houston Texas Gas & Oil Corporation, Lewis W. Petteway, R. Y. Patterson, Jr. and Cecil A. Beasley, Jr. for the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, and Ford L. Thompson and Mr. Beasley for the Florida Development Commission, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.