Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ex parte Emmet H. Bozel, 1941 — 313 U.S. 548 · caselaw · US
General
Ex parte Emmet H. Bozel
313 U.S. 548·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. —, original.
Ex parte Emmet H. Bozel.
May 26, 1941.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to a further application to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, and for proceedings thereon in accordance with the decisions in Walker v. Johnston, 312 U. S. 275, and Holiday v. Johnston, ante, p. 342.